When Dorceta Taylor took her first biology course at Northeastern Illinois University, it quickly dawned on her that she was the only black undergrad in the room. Growing up in Jamaica, she鈥檇 always sat in science classes with black, white, Indian, and Chinese kids. 鈥淲e did STEM like there鈥檚 no tomorrow,鈥 she says. So then why, she wondered, were her science classes in the United States so uniform?
Taylor posed the question to her professor, whose response was surprisingly unscientific. 鈥淎frican Americans aren鈥檛 interested,鈥 he said. His generalization was based on a body of research that points to a lack of connections between black urbanites and nature. But as a member of that community, Taylor knew it wasn鈥檛 true.
Her hunch was confirmed when she started finding cracks in the research. One touted analysis compared the perspectives of black children in New Haven, Connecticut, with perspectives from white adults in well-to-do suburbs. Class wasn鈥檛 factored into the responses. Another survey looked at black women鈥檚 opinions of a Philadelphia park to characterize 鈥渁 legacy of fear toward the city鈥檚 natural environment.鈥 The space in question was neglected, crime-torn, and hardly a suitable habitat for families or wildlife.
Flawed studies like these have led to what Taylor calls 鈥渆ternal stereotypes鈥 in conversations about racial representation (and the lack of it) in the environmental field. So the newly minted American set out to draw more sincere and accurate conclusions. Thirty-five years later, as a professor, author, and director of diversity, equity, and inclusion at the University of Michigan鈥檚 School of Environment and Sustainability, she鈥檚 finding better ways of polling communities and improving the pool of data. It鈥檚 this work that earned her 约炮视频鈥檚 2018 Rachel Carson Award.
Taylor鈥檚 most recent research, published in the journal last month, focuses on the values and viewpoints of minority college students studying STEM. For it she included 157 individuals selected randomly from three U.S. universities (a public one, a private one, and a historically black one from different geographies). The subjects were sent eight photos of landscapes and animal species鈥攕ome remote, some urban鈥攁nd were asked to rate their preference for each. Then, they responded to open-ended questions on their notions of nature.