Scientists Enlist Drones to Eavesdrop on Songbirds

Using drones equipped with audio recorders, a team of researchers is testing whether the technology could aid in field surveys.

At first glance, Andrew Wilson鈥檚 latest research seems risky. 鈥淚鈥檝e been counting birds for a living for a long time,鈥 he says. So why explore whether drones equipped with audio recorders can do just as well as his own ears? Wilson isn't worried about being replaced by machines鈥攂ut he does think the assemblies could help ornithologists research songbird populations, especially on terrain that鈥檚 tricky for scientists to navigate, such as wetlands.

Ecologists have enlisted drones on a whole range of projects, from counting species in photographs to collecting radio-collar data from individuals and . But the work by , an ecologist at Gettysburg College, is the first ecology project using drones to capture audio data. The results were published  in The Auk. 鈥淭his is kind of baby鈥檚 first steps, but we think we鈥檝e proved concept,鈥 Wilson says. He鈥檚 particularly pleased that buying all the equipment only took about $1500, so it won鈥檛 break a research team鈥檚 budget.

For the trial run, Wilson stuck to familiar territory. The team used the campus atheletic field, and placed speakers emitting birdsong recordings at measured intervals. Then they flew the drones by the speakers at different heights to test how close the recorders need to be to pick up useable data. This also gave the team a chance to figure out how best to hang the recorder from the drone. Dangling the recorder about 26 feet, they found, reduced enough noise from the motor while also avoiding any potential tangles with obstacles below.  

Once Wilson knew the recorders鈥 range, he pitted the drones against a trained ornithologist skilled in counting birds by ear鈥攈imself. Although some researchers are already training computers to identify birds based on recorded calls, that technology is still too limited in reliability for field surveys. So for this work, humans still have to listen to all the recordings after the flight to gauge the audio equipment's success. 

In the head-to-head comparison on a wide grassy area studded with trees, Wilson鈥檚 ears on the ground picked up more songs than the drones, reassuring that field surveys aren鈥檛 going away any time soon. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 ever going to replace what field ornithologists do,鈥 Wilson says. 鈥淚 think it鈥檚 going to be an additional tool.鈥   

But for a first attempt, he was pleased with results from the flying recorders, especially since all bird-counting protocols鈥攅specially those aimed at small birds鈥攈ave their weaknesses. In three minutes at each location, he identified birds of 51 species; the drones that followed him allowed the team to identify birds of 32 of those species. The cheaper, lighter recorders they chose for practicality鈥檚 sake were likely responsible for some of the missed birds, about half of which Wilson himself only heard one individual.

The real perk of drones would be saving scientists the trouble of getting out to a specific point on the ground. 鈥淥ne of the big problems with bird surveys is walking from one point to another,鈥 Wilson says. But with a drone, he adds, 鈥測ou can really zip between them and potentially cover a large area.鈥

Wilson did stumble on a couple of hiccups unique to such a study. Gray Catbirds are so common in the area that experts listening to the recordings had trouble pinning down precisely how many birds were calling at once. And Mourning Doves, it turns out, call at about the same pitch as the whirr of a drone motor, so they tend to get drowned out.

This is one challenge that could be reduced with advances in recording and drone technology鈥攐r even a different type of vehicle. Despite dangling 26 feet below the drones, the recorders still picked up some of the noise from the motors that drive the quadcopters. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a very classic little drone, but it makes a lot of noise,鈥 says Julie Linchant, an ecologist projects enlisting drones for conservation and science goals. Linchant suggests a balloon could be particularly helpful for audio recording, since it can hover quietly. 

Wilson is the first to say the technique needs more work. He鈥檚 particularly concerned with drones might affect how birds behave. 鈥淚f the noise of the drone is too loud, then birds aren鈥檛 going to waste the energy singing,鈥 he says. His goal for this summer is to make audio recordings on the ground starting before a drone flies by, to see whether birds hush up when drones are near. After all, no matter how advanced the drone or audio equipment, his technique can鈥檛 record silent birds.